|
|||||||
| Windows XP / 2000 / NT / 9x Forum Discussion for Windows operating systems from XP right back to the very beginnings! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
HardwareHeaven Lover
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 119
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
how xp cd-keys work?
i just messed up my aunt's computer. she has no back up disks or anything and its a HP computer, so i tried looking online to order one. it turns out though that its too late cuz after a few years they run out and dont have anymore. so what it recommends is to go and buy windows and install that one. but thats retarded. so my uncle has a legal copy of XP pro and i was able to find out what his CD key is. if i install windows on my aunt's computer using that key, will it work? by work, i mean will i be able to get all the downloads and not get the key blacklisted? or will i just end up screwing both of them over?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Sorry to say it, but you can only use the key on 1 machine at a time unless it's a Corporate or multi-licensed key, which I doubt it is. When you go to activate it the activation will fail. Yes, you could call, and get it activated for that machine, but then your uncles computer would stop working when it tries to do it's Genuine Advantage check (which is something like very 4 weeks) as it's not the machine assigned to the key anymore.
Your cheapest (and legal) solution would be to buy an OEM copy of Windows. You can still find them if you look, but a copy of Windows XP Home (the updated versions with SP3 are now available btw) would run you about $90 on Newegg, and maybe even cheaper if you look around. Just for reference, there is no cdkey on your Aunt's HP machine? I ask because HP is required to put a sticker on every machine they sell regardless of whether they use that key, or the bulk key they normally use. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HardwareHeaven Lover
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 119
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
oh man, really? i gotta go check tomorrow to see if there is. i downloaded the magic jelly bean thing to find my uncle's key, his is a HP also. didnt bother to check the case. my aunts cant start so i couldn't do the same for hers. thanks for the advise. =D
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Whatever you do, do not use the key that Magic Jellybean finds if it is different than the one on the sticker, and if it is the same, definitely do not use it. In almost all cases you will never be able to activate the bulk license key that manufacturers use. However, if the key on the sticker attached to the system is different than the one MJ finds XP is currently using then you could then use the key on that sticker. Legally you "technically" shouldn't do this, so my advice is that if your Aunt's system has a sticker you should try it first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Can you clarify what is inaccurate about it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Flash Banner Hater
|
Some tips to remake an OEM SLP XP disk from a standard one
Help with Windows XP Home OEM! - TechSpot Troubleshooting OEMBIOS Repository - you MAY be able to get the OEMBIOS files you need from here, and in general, any OEM SLP key (the key usually reported by keyfinder on "royalty OEM" should work, as the security is not in the key, but in having the appropriate system builder branded motherboard). Alternatively, extract the required files from a similar system if possible. Also, the "sticker key" from an OEM is barred from auto-activation, as piracy using the individual key as well as the OEM bulk key was a problem, so using the sticker key requires telephone authentication.
__________________
Mary had a little lamb, Her father shot it dead Now Mary takes her lamb to school, Between two crusts of bread
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Fell off the tech wagon
|
Most if not all computers bought have the Windows sticker posted on the laptop/desktop etc.
All you would need is the disk and type in that key found on the tower,laptop etc and it should work right? Unless she took that sticker off then you are out of luck ![]() Not 100% however lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Paul
Posts: 568
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
working in a warehouse that repaired notebooks daily
almost all the notebooks used the royal oem key. they never really had the serial that was on the sticker. Find the OEM version of your OS (or make one with the help of the oembios files) and install, it should activate it and let you go without any cd keys needed.
__________________
2006 Subaru Impreza WRX |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
Yes, you could use it on more than one machine, but I find it interesting that you haven't said how. There is no way to do it legally. I could tell people how to bypass all the WGA stuff, or how certain situtations keep WGA from reacting or talking, but I can't. Not only is it against Microsofts user agreement, but it is also against this sites forum rules. 'Course, if you know how to install and keep 2 machines running the same XP Home or XP Pro CDKey going, legally, while not breaking the user agreement, as well as staying within the context of this sites forum rules, I would love to here your answer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
All wheel driver!
|
Quote:
So that's what I did. but they wouldn't help me out... so I went back to using win 2000. it really did baffle me (not my exact words at the time) , but how you can buy a product from someone, only to then be made to go out and buy it AGAIN a few months later!... How can that be legal? that's what happened when my brother bought windows VISTA 'before' he upgraded his PC's internals.. HE HAD TO BUY IT TWICE! How can microsoft (who lets face it, aren't short of a bob or two) make a case for copyright protection, when they, in response, end up stealing money from people who 'have actually' legally bought there slow-ware? Not to mention the fact that the crap they've been selling us for all these years has been full of bugs and errors that, if it were any other line of industry would have been totally un exceptable! And if anything they would owe 'us' money in 'compensation' for all the hours lost both in buisness & pleasure , just trying to get the damn thing to work properly. ![]() And they certanly shouldn't be allowed to develop GFX APi's that effectively hold us to ransom as to 'what' OS we must upgrade to in order to use the latest features on the the latest hardware with the latest games! give me one good reason why dx10 couln't run have run of windows XP? ![]() its because, just like Gordan brown.. microsoft want us all to bend over while we pick up the soap. ![]() rant over.
__________________
Processor: 7.5 Memory: 7.7 Graphics: 7.2 Gaming Graphics: 7.2 Primary Hard Disk: 5.9 [3DMARK Vantage: 9229] [3DMARK 06: 18365] [3DMARK 03: 46941] [3DMARK 2001 SE: 36059] [3DMARK 2000: 29438] ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||||
|
HH's Nokia shareholder!
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
HH Administrator
|
I upgraded my mobo, cpu, ram with Vista OEM, had to phone up told the guy my mobo had fried and he gave me the code.
Few months later I put in all new hard drives and another CPU, again told them my hard drive had died and they gave me the code. Only ever paid once. Have probably activated at least ten or more times now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
All wheel driver!
|
Quote:
& if it IS Written in the license agreement or not, how is jane & jo blogs suppose to realize that fact when they pick it up off the shelf? ![]() As for dx10 , my point was that the gfx card & game company's should do us all a big favor and stop working on microsofts terms. They should all get together and produce there own gfx API, independent of microsoft.. just like back in the day of GLIDE , so that the people once again have a 'choice' as to what OS they run. instead of being held to ransom by bill gates and his cronies and forced to buy pointless window dressed software , and being forced to upgrade all our hardware at the same time because the new OS runs soooo much slower than the last one. ![]() i'm not saying we should all be able to run the latest games on a 286! But Surly having a wide(er) choice of still viable past OS's for our games, would also open up the potential for game developers to target buyers who will upgrade there system for a 'GAME' but just not for the sake of a pointless operating system, that is only good for knocking a thousand points off our 3D MARK.
__________________
Processor: 7.5 Memory: 7.7 Graphics: 7.2 Gaming Graphics: 7.2 Primary Hard Disk: 5.9 [3DMARK Vantage: 9229] [3DMARK 06: 18365] [3DMARK 03: 46941] [3DMARK 2001 SE: 36059] [3DMARK 2000: 29438] ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
HH's Nokia shareholder!
|
If it was full retail version of Vista then I'm puzzled since I have home premium and I did upgrade at last xmas and installled Vista fresh, I had to call to the activation number to get it activated for the first time but after that no issues with that feature at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Yes--However my comment was legal notwithstanding (as it was irrelevant).
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
Getting back to the original point, the EULA for both XP Home and XP Pro specifically says that you cannot install the operating system on more than one machine: "You may install, use, access, display and run one copy of the Software on a single computer, such as a workstation, terminal or other device (“Workstation Computer”). The Software may not be used by more than two (2) processors at any one time on any single Workstation Computer. How much more plainly can that be said? Along with that, according to the EULA you are required to activate that copy of software you install by supplying the required information to activate your licensed software if you decide to use it after that 30 days. Now, while it doesn't directly mention the use of "keys" it does mention that the software in question uses "technological measures" to prevent unlicensed use of their software, and uses those "measures" to verify that you have a legitimately licensed software. Product keys are one of those "measures" the EULA describes, and is one of the pieces of information required to activate the software. This kind of product activation requiring a "key" as proof has been an industry standard for years now, and again, they don't have to say it as plain as day in the EULA. A key is given with each product disc, each EULA, and each Certificate of Authenticity. It's not there to look cool. It has a function, and Microsoft uses it to protect the product, to verify it is legit. In this case, using a key to install a piece of software ties that key to the machine it is being installed on. If you use the same key you used to install the software on one machine on another machine, it means that you are transferring that key to that other machine, and under the EULA you are required to remove the product from the prior machine. That is not me saying so. That is plainly stated in the EULA. So, according to the EULA you cannot, without breach of license, use the same key, or rather use that same software and the accompanying information to activate that software on more than one machine. Period. BTW, I never said that WGA was mentioned in the EULA directly. Microsoft does not have to directly mention Windows Genuine Advantage in their EULA as it is inferred to by other means: "This EULA applies to updates, supplements, add-on components, product support services, or Internet-based services components, of the Software that you may obtain from Microsoft after the date you obtain your initial copy of the Software, unless you accept updated terms or another agreement governs." If Microsoft were to add every piece of addition, supplement, or other piece of code they wanted to add to their software by name in the EULA it would be miles long, and there would be an endless number of EULA revisions. All they have to do is use a broad brush, and include any possible "updates, supplements, add-on components, product support services, or Internet-based services components" they publish to fall under the EULA. To be even more legally technical, they can also include updated, and/or more expanded EULAs with the various components they supply, which, coincidentally, WGA has. However, just because WGA has it's own EULA doesn't mean that the original EULA, the one that came with the operating system, becomes void or moot. It technically takes precedence over the WGAs EULA as WGA "technically" falls under the section of the EULA described above. To be frank, the original posters questions were asked and answered a month ago. I haven't the time or energy for this kind of debate, plus this isn't being of any positive help to anyone, so I'm moving on to other things. With that, adieu.
__________________
_________________________________ Brain: So, you sacked the cocky khaki Kicky Sack sock plucker? Mr. Sackett: The second cocky khaki Kicky Sack sock plucker I've sacked since the sixth sitting sheet slitter got sick. Last edited by Tipstaff; Jul 23, 2008 at 11:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |||
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Indeed you had not, nor had I made mention that you had made mention that WGA was mentioned in the EULA directly. It was not my intention to start a debate (especially a long one); if I had suspected a debate, I would not have likely posted information (the time required would become to great). This is a point of stoppage for this discussion. You cannot know this to be true. |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|