Warning-[sp2 Rtm]-warning

~~REGENERAT1ON~~ · Aug 8, 2004, 02:56 AM

there is 2 builds of SP2 2180 RTM

1.
WindowsXP-KB835935-SP2-ENU.exe (278,927,592 Bytes)
MD5:59A98F18 1FE38390 7E520A39 1D75B5A7
has Digital Signature.
can be found on WindowsBeta and P2P networks
this is the original file!

2.
xpsp2_RTM_ENU.exe (278,920,704 Bytes)
MD5:94276421 FA963122 A4E434D3 B14FDC01
NO Digital Signature!!!
this file exists on many mirrors (*.onlinedown.net,*.pchome.net,*gorge.net,*cnbb.co m.cn)
the both files has same files. but this file has modified installer and no digital signature
if you installed this build. uninstall it and get the original or wait for MS to release for the public
this version may have "something" in the installer

watch out! and use MD5 checking tool (google for md5check.exe) to make sure its the original file!
and use file properties to make sure the file has Digital signature

PangingJr · Aug 8, 2004, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by REGENERAT1ON

2.
xpsp2_RTM_ENU.exe (278,920,704 Bytes)
MD5:94276421 FA963122 A4E434D3 B14FDC01
NO Digital Signature!!!
this file exists on many mirrors (*.onlinedown.net,*.pchome.net,*gorge.net,*cnbb.co m.cn)
the both files has same files. but this file has modified installer and no digital signature
if you installed this build. uninstall it and get the original or wait for MS to release for the public
this version may have "something" in the installer

XPSP2_RTm 040803-2158
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ic.windowsxp.*

The_Neon_Cowboy · Aug 8, 2004, 02:20 PM

94276421fa963122a4e434d3b14fdc01 xpsp2_RTM_ENU.exe

If I had to guess is the beta, before it was made offical RTM and
then signed becouse I have installed it and nothing happened .....

But none the less I won't slip stram this copy I'll look for one that is signed
thanks for the heads up

RIV@NVX · Aug 9, 2004, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Neon_Cowboy
94276421fa963122a4e434d3b14fdc01 xpsp2_RTM_ENU.exe

If I had to guess is the beta, before it was made offical RTM and
then signed becouse I have installed it and nothing happened .....

But none the less I won't slip stram this copy I'll look for one that is signed
thanks for the heads up

They are same except the last bits which are digital signature. No other difference.

refraction · Aug 9, 2004, 11:22 AM

i think id prefer using the digitally signed version, any exploits or something could have been opened in the unsigned one, least with the signed one i can guarentee that theres nothing dodgy about it

pr0digal jenius · Aug 9, 2004, 05:47 PM

i've had the 'unsigned' one for a few days and it's perfectly fine

it's not like 7 KBs is gunna ruin anything

Aug 8, 2004, 02:56 AM	#1
~~REGENERAT1ON~~ NGO Crew Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 409 Rep Power: 0	Warning-[sp2 Rtm]-warning there is 2 builds of SP2 2180 RTM 1. WindowsXP-KB835935-SP2-ENU.exe (278,927,592 Bytes) MD5:59A98F18 1FE38390 7E520A39 1D75B5A7 has Digital Signature. can be found on WindowsBeta and P2P networks this is the original file! 2. xpsp2_RTM_ENU.exe (278,920,704 Bytes) MD5:94276421 FA963122 A4E434D3 B14FDC01 NO Digital Signature!!! this file exists on many mirrors (.onlinedown.net,.pchome.net,gorge.net,cnbb.co m.cn) the both files has same files. but this file has modified installer and no digital signature if you installed this build. uninstall it and get the original or wait for MS to release for the public this version may have "something" in the installer watch out! and use MD5 checking tool (google for md5check.exe) to make sure its the original file! and use file properties to make sure the file has Digital signature

Aug 8, 2004, 02:20 PM	#3
The_Neon_Cowboy HardwareHeaven Extreme Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: U.S.A. Posts: 16,009 Rep Power: 92 System Specs	94276421fa963122a4e434d3b14fdc01 xpsp2_RTM_ENU.exe If I had to guess is the beta, before it was made offical RTM and then signed becouse I have installed it and nothing happened ..... But none the less I won't slip stram this copy I'll look for one that is signed thanks for the heads up __________________

Aug 9, 2004, 11:22 AM	#5
refraction DriverHeaven Addict Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 307 Rep Power: 0 $refraction is on a distinguished road$	i think id prefer using the digitally signed version, any exploits or something could have been opened in the unsigned one, least with the signed one i can guarentee that theres nothing dodgy about it __________________ [color=royalblue]Computer Specs[/color] := [color=royalblue]AMD Opteron 146 2.0Ghz @ 2.9Ghz[/color] = [color=royalblue]1024Mb PC4400 RAM Dual Channel[/color] = [color=royalblue]Gainward BLISS 7900GTX 512mb[/color] = [color=royalblue]SB Audigy 4 [/color]= [color=royalblue]250Gb SATA Hard Drive[/color] = [color=royalblue]Thermaltake Xaser Case [/color]= [color=royalblue]Benq FP91G+[/color][color=royalblue] 19" TFT[/color]
$refraction is offline$

Aug 9, 2004, 05:47 PM	#6
pr0digal jenius Delete Me Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 14,648 Rep Power: 0	i've had the 'unsigned' one for a few days and it's perfectly fine it's not like 7 KBs is gunna ruin anything