|
|||||||
| Windows XP / 2000 / NT / 9x Forum Discussion for Windows operating systems from XP right back to the very beginnings! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
HardwareHeaven Lover
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 119
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
system/video BIOS cacheable
i went to omegadrivers.com and got my radeon 950 softmoded to 9700,. then i saw this thing under ms bios. it gave a list of BIOs settings you could change to make your omega driver perform more better.
anywho, there are only 4 options i have that are listed there. is that possible? thats so little. AGP sperture size Init display first system BIOS cacheable video RAM cacheable the thing is though, my BIOS listed video RAM cacheable as video BIOS cacheable. are they the same? =/ just to make sure before i change that one edit: what do the system and video bios cacheable do anyways? it said to disable them... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Caffeine Machine
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hell is empty. All the devils are here.
Posts: 670
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
[color=white][color=white]Video RAM Cacheable[color=black][/color][/color]
[color=white]Disable this. You don't want to be wasting the L2 cache on fast video RAM when you have slow system RAM to deal with. The bandwidth of your system RAM is unlikely to be over 3GB/sec, yet video RAM can easily top 10GB/sec and a 4x AGP bus is 533MB/sec. The tiny amounts of L2 we get these days to go with our massive system RAM sizes relegate this setting to being Disabled.[/color][/color] |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Delete Me
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,648
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yep...neon's right....although if you mgiht give 64MB aperture size a shot and see which runs better...I can run either without noticing much difference, personally.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|