nVIDIA ForceWare Drivers for Windows 2000/XP (32-bit) 93.71 Official WHQL Drivers

Prince_Link · Nov 4, 2006, 06:28 AM

jeeeez what is wrong anyway people

you all saw that 96.89 had issues!, then you install 93.71 and complains coz it does as well

what do you expect, 96.89 is a newer build then 93.71,.. don't let the dates fool you. 93.71 only has a newer date becoz thats when it was WHQL certified.

so of course 93.71 is going to have almost the same bugs as 96.89

mike2h · Nov 4, 2006, 07:53 AM

not true.... 2 different dev teams. though a lot of the bugs r the ame due to base drivers being similar.
not that it matters, looks like both sets sx.

mike2h · Nov 4, 2006, 07:53 AM

not true.... 2 different dev teams. though a lot of the bugs r the same due to base drivers being similar.
not that it matters, looks like both sets sx.

Prince_Link · Nov 4, 2006, 08:46 AM

whether its a different team or not, the drivers more often then not still have the exact same issues.

maybe its time they stopped having multiple teams and just issued 1 working driver a month.

mike2h · Nov 4, 2006, 09:21 PM

i wished! lol

petri1 · Nov 11, 2006, 11:39 AM

well i tryed these and i got some improvements in 3Dmark tests as follows

3Dmark03 21111 earlier 21076 i don´t remeber if it was 92.91´s or later but i guess it was 92.91´s

3Dmark 05 9997 to ronud 9645
btu this supprises me most
3Dmark 06 5770 i never go that much using 91.27 to the latest drivers

so far these eems work great but games is the malody and that is next

thought might be good to hear someone got thsese work properly or without problems so far.

yes it the whql´d

here´s quake 4 on Ultra Quality

Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
2353, 46935, 0, 62, 50.133

pretty good i think

fear as well

well there it is some benches on these drivers

these do better than the latest do actually

ViP3RH3LL · Nov 11, 2006, 09:27 PM

Well until they get this overheating/overclocking bug fixed I staying with 91.47-8 drivers. They 93.xx and 96.xx are a waste of time.

IamLakota · Nov 26, 2006, 12:50 PM

Hees a question,how do you override the refresh rate mine will only allow 60hz I used to be able to atleast set 75hz as the rate.

Nov 4, 2006, 06:28 AM	#31
Prince_Link HardwareHeaven Addict Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 274 Rep Power: 0	jeeeez what is wrong anyway people you all saw that 96.89 had issues!, then you install 93.71 and complains coz it does as well what do you expect, 96.89 is a newer build then 93.71,.. don't let the dates fool you. 93.71 only has a newer date becoz thats when it was WHQL certified. so of course 93.71 is going to have almost the same bugs as 96.89 __________________

Nov 4, 2006, 07:53 AM	#32
mike2h DriverHeaven Extreme Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: norcal Posts: 6,483 Rep Power: 76 System Specs	not true.... 2 different dev teams. though a lot of the bugs r the ame due to base drivers being similar. not that it matters, looks like both sets sx. __________________

Nov 4, 2006, 07:53 AM	#33
mike2h DriverHeaven Extreme Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: norcal Posts: 6,483 Rep Power: 76 System Specs	not true.... 2 different dev teams. though a lot of the bugs r the same due to base drivers being similar. not that it matters, looks like both sets sx. __________________

Nov 4, 2006, 08:46 AM	#34
Prince_Link HardwareHeaven Addict Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 274 Rep Power: 0	whether its a different team or not, the drivers more often then not still have the exact same issues. maybe its time they stopped having multiple teams and just issued 1 working driver a month. __________________

Nov 4, 2006, 09:21 PM	#35
mike2h DriverHeaven Extreme Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: norcal Posts: 6,483 Rep Power: 76 System Specs	i wished! lol __________________

Nov 11, 2006, 11:39 AM	#36
petri1 DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 746 Rep Power: 0	well i tryed these and i got some improvements in 3Dmark tests as follows 3Dmark03 21111 earlier 21076 i don´t remeber if it was 92.91´s or later but i guess it was 92.91´s 3Dmark 05 9997 to ronud 9645 btu this supprises me most 3Dmark 06 5770 i never go that much using 91.27 to the latest drivers so far these eems work great but games is the malody and that is next thought might be good to hear someone got thsese work properly or without problems so far. yes it the whql´d here´s quake 4 on Ultra Quality Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 2353, 46935, 0, 62, 50.133 pretty good i think fear as well well there it is some benches on these drivers these do better than the latest do actually __________________ [COLOR=#232d35] [COLOR=Red]Intel Core 2 Quad 9450@2,66GHZ PowerColor Ati Radeon HD4870 512mb Gigabyte GaE-X38 4GB Kingston Hyper X [/COLOR] [/COLOR] Last edited by petri1; Nov 11, 2006 at 04:46 PM.

Nov 11, 2006, 09:27 PM	#37
ViP3RH3LL DriverHeaven Addict Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: BF2142 Posts: 265 Rep Power: 0	Well until they get this overheating/overclocking bug fixed I staying with 91.47-8 drivers. They 93.xx and 96.xx are a waste of time.

Nov 26, 2006, 12:50 PM	#38
IamLakota HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Viriginia Posts: 552 Rep Power: 0	Hees a question,how do you override the refresh rate mine will only allow 60hz I used to be able to atleast set 75hz as the rate. __________________ Harley Davidson: If You Have To Ask You Wouldn't Understand!!! System Specs: Mobo:Asus P6T Deluxe V2,intel i7 920,2x BFG GTX 250 oc in SLI,Corsair 6gigs tri channel pc12800CL8 2xWD Velociraptor's 2x74gig WD Raptor , X-Fi Fatal1ty Titainium,HANNS-G HG281HD 1080p 28" monitor,Coolermaster HAF/922,PC-PWR&Cooling Sliencer 750,CoolerMaster V8 HSF