GF4 Ti4200's driver

McWolf · Oct 28, 2004, 01:12 AM

It seems 56.72 is the best one for it. All 6x.xx have some graphic problem

Electroe · Oct 29, 2004, 02:44 AM

My best and last drivers for my Ti4200 is Omega's 1.5672a. Since using them I've never had to try any others.

makih · Nov 5, 2004, 11:54 PM

I'm just wondering...why older than 56.72 omega's shows my graphic cards ram as 16mb/32mb/64mb and it should be 128 (GF4ti4200 nv28)

makih · Nov 5, 2004, 11:55 PM

Oh and could it be related to dx9c and win xp sp2?

McWolf · Nov 7, 2004, 08:05 AM

I also have a GF4 128M, have no the problem.

realjessy · Nov 8, 2004, 06:11 AM

play new games wid old driver = slow ass

just notice u that.....

makih · Nov 8, 2004, 06:17 AM

Yep...I noticed that nowadays older create weard lag in games even on CS 1.6
like I had lack of memory :S I'm currently using SS 56.72X. I found they are the best
for my GF4 Ti4200.

refraction · Nov 9, 2004, 08:11 AM

the reason the older drivers work better for the 4200 is because it is an old card now, when they make these "unified" drivers they tweak them to work better on their newer range of cards, the 5x.xx series was more the mid range FX boards really, the 4x.xx series was more for the Geforce 4's, but the 6x.xx series is made for the high end FX boards and the forthcomming release of the GF6800 series boards (dont think they were quite out when them drivers were made) and tweaked to work better on them than any other cards.

just cos your using an old driver dont feel left out, just use whats perfect for your card, not what is the next driver release

makih · Nov 9, 2004, 09:27 AM

4x.xx sucked at new games like doom3,farcry,thug2 (weird lag) but they are the best for 3dmark01se

but u dont play games with marks ;P

makih · Nov 9, 2004, 09:35 AM

Maybe its time to move on and buy GF6800 nu and better cpu like xp 3000+

Oct 28, 2004, 01:12 AM	#1
McWolf DriverHeaven Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 27 Rep Power: 0	GF4 Ti4200's driver It seems 56.72 is the best one for it. All 6x.xx have some graphic problem __________________

Oct 29, 2004, 02:44 AM	#2
Electroe DH wanderer Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: 20 min. to Computex Taipei Posts: 137 Rep Power: 0	My best and last drivers for my Ti4200 is Omega's 1.5672a. Since using them I've never had to try any others. __________________ 世界上最遙遠的距離，不是在電話的兩端，而是你不知道你一直在我心裡世界上最遙遠的距離，不是你不知道你一直在我心裡，而是我沒有在你心裡世界上最遙遠的距離，不是我沒有在你心裡，而是你不讓我永遠照顧你世界上最遙遠的距離，不是你不讓我永遠照顧你，而是我沒辦法堅持照顧你的勇氣

Nov 7, 2004, 08:05 AM	Thread Starter #5
McWolf DriverHeaven Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 27 Rep Power: 0	I also have a GF4 128M, have no the problem. __________________

Nov 9, 2004, 08:11 AM	#8
refraction DriverHeaven Addict Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 307 Rep Power: 0 $refraction is on a distinguished road$	the reason the older drivers work better for the 4200 is because it is an old card now, when they make these "unified" drivers they tweak them to work better on their newer range of cards, the 5x.xx series was more the mid range FX boards really, the 4x.xx series was more for the Geforce 4's, but the 6x.xx series is made for the high end FX boards and the forthcomming release of the GF6800 series boards (dont think they were quite out when them drivers were made) and tweaked to work better on them than any other cards. just cos your using an old driver dont feel left out, just use whats perfect for your card, not what is the next driver release __________________ [color=royalblue]Computer Specs[/color] := [color=royalblue]AMD Opteron 146 2.0Ghz @ 2.9Ghz[/color] = [color=royalblue]1024Mb PC4400 RAM Dual Channel[/color] = [color=royalblue]Gainward BLISS 7900GTX 512mb[/color] = [color=royalblue]SB Audigy 4 [/color]= [color=royalblue]250Gb SATA Hard Drive[/color] = [color=royalblue]Thermaltake Xaser Case [/color]= [color=royalblue]Benq FP91G+[/color][color=royalblue] 19" TFT[/color]
$refraction is offline$

Nov 5, 2004, 11:54 PM	#3
makih HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Finland Posts: 78 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	I'm just wondering...why older than 56.72 omega's shows my graphic cards ram as 16mb/32mb/64mb and it should be 128 (GF4ti4200 nv28)

Nov 5, 2004, 11:55 PM	#4
makih HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Finland Posts: 78 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	Oh and could it be related to dx9c and win xp sp2?

Nov 8, 2004, 06:11 AM	#6
realjessy DrvierHeaven Driver Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 110 Rep Power: 0	play new games wid old driver = slow ass just notice u that.....

Nov 8, 2004, 06:17 AM	#7
makih HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Finland Posts: 78 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	Yep...I noticed that nowadays older create weard lag in games even on CS 1.6 like I had lack of memory :S I'm currently using SS 56.72X. I found they are the best for my GF4 Ti4200.

Nov 9, 2004, 09:27 AM	#9
makih HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Finland Posts: 78 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	4x.xx sucked at new games like doom3,farcry,thug2 (weird lag) but they are the best for 3dmark01se but u dont play games with marks ;P

Nov 9, 2004, 09:35 AM	#10
makih HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Finland Posts: 78 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	Maybe its time to move on and buy GF6800 nu and better cpu like xp 3000+