|
|||||||
| Windows XP & Linux NVIDIA Display Drivers If you have a problem with the NVIDIA ForceWare Drivers on XP or Linux then this is the place to get help! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Swedish Moon Base
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
WHQL 66.93 drivers are up at Nvidia
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 28
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
You just beat me to the post!!
They are also on the Main driver page. http://www.nvidia.com/object/winxp_2k_66.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
|
oc test:
66.72: 420/1130 66.93: 427/1130 as i recall, 66.81 was even worse at oc'ing than 66.72...
__________________
No more Kitty!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Caffeine Machine
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hell is empty. All the devils are here.
Posts: 670
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Nice OC. Hopefully, I can gain a few more mhz too.
Did anyone bench these yet? It's gonna be a while before I can go home to test 'em.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
All i did is ran 3d mark03 once to check it out.. With 66.81 beta ones i got 6866 with my PCX 5900, then with the 66.93 i got 6847... so lost about 20 points. Dunno.. But some of my other problems have been fixed. Plus when I looked at the details of my system in 3dmark03 it says my WHQL certification is false... I dunno why... Any help?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
|
66.93 has odd performance when viewing xvid compressed file.
__________________
No more Kitty!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Are they WHQL? They said so on the site but using the details on 3dMark03 it says thatDriver WHQL Certified false. .... Anyone know why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Caffeine Machine
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hell is empty. All the devils are here.
Posts: 670
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
did you completely remove the old drivers with driver cleaner first?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Official Cyberpunk ^_-
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 912
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Well, did anyone notice any difference in WMV performance? I ran step into liquid demo and it still has CPU hits of 100% with Windows Media Player...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
no i didn't use driver cleaner i used a diffrent uninstaller program. Its really good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Official Cyberpunk ^_-
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 912
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,588
Rep Power: 66 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Damn they snuck these out on me I'll try and get some benchies tonight....
__________________
[COLOR=Blue]“Alright boys, let’s start her up and see why she doesn’t work.” - John Fritz
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds ATI Catalyst Beta Tester[/COLOR] |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
ein Krieger
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clemson Uni
Posts: 3,127
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
wonder when we can expect omega's?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Ok well i tried the Driver cleaner on this site and It didn't change the WHQL false thing... Anyone else get this? Does it matter my card is an Asus Card?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,588
Rep Power: 66 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
[COLOR=Blue]“Alright boys, let’s start her up and see why she doesn’t work.” - John Fritz
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds ATI Catalyst Beta Tester[/COLOR] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,112
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
I only did 2 benches yesterday;
3D 2005 66.81 420/1200 - 5300 3D 2005 66.93 420/1200 - 5150 3D 2003 66.81 430/1250 - 13000 3D 2003 66.93 420/1250 - 12600
__________________
MOBO: [color=white]ASUS A8N-SLI Premium[/color] CPU: AMD 64 3200+ (Venice) @ 2,50 Ghz MEM: 2 x 512 DDR 466, VGA: 2 x 6600 GT in SLI, HDD1: WD Raptor HDD2: Maxtor Diamond Plus 9, Case: Antec Plus View 1080, PSU: ThermalTake PurePower 500W, MX 1000, Dell 2001 FP, Aud. 2 SZ |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
While its true that asus doesnt allways follow the Nvidia design, it has nothing to do with WHQL!
__________________
P4 2.6 @ 3.4 Ghz Asus P4C800 Deluxe E 2x512 Mb kingston Hyper X PC 3500 @ 460 Mhz Club 3d 6800 GT @ 425/1110 2x160 Gb Seagate 7200.7 Audigy LS Samsung syncmaster 959NF Thermalright silent Purepower 480 W 3Dmark03: 12649 Aquamark3: 62735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
HardwareHeaven Lover
|
Wonder how long it'll take before Omega gets around to doing a set of his tweaked version of these...(since he'll only do ones that're posted up on nVidia's site...which THESE are.)
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Got MCE 2005 incompatibility with 66.93 running a P25-S676 with NV FX GO5700. I did NOT use the driver remover though. Could that change everything?
Does anyone know if 66.93 SHOULD be compatible with nVidia FX GO5700 in theory? Thanks in advance. Hans |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
ein Krieger
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clemson Uni
Posts: 3,127
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
AFAIK, you have to get NV Go drivers from your manufacturers website (i.e. acer, alienware, toshiba, etc etc). These are special cards and the normal drivers do not have the instruction sets required in them. It has to do with the power saving options and all of that. It's all on NV's website if you have any questions.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|