|
|||||||
| Windows XP Radeon Display Drivers The official Omegadrive support forum. Also discuss ATI's Catalyst Control Center and windows drivers here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Problem with Sapphire Radeon HD 2600 PRO with current omega drivers
Hello, I'm new on the forums and I just bought a AGP Sapphire Radeon HD 2600 PRO today and I installed the newest omega drivers. After installation and setup/reboot, I tried testing it out with a game I had a solid 60fps on with my 9800PRO before it pooped. What happened was I only got like 15fps on constant and going into my ATI tray tools showed:
Clock Information BIOS VPU 600.00 Current VPU 0.00 BIOS MEM 400.00 Current MEM 0.00 Going into the hardware section, it doesn't let me overclock and such. I have no idea whats wrong and I wish I could just play games again . I was wondering if anyone could tell me the problem?Thanks Last edited by Ayaya; Feb 20, 2008 at 07:12 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
USB 3 dot oh
|
Moved to a more appropriate forum
![]() Anyways Did you uninstall the previous drivers before installing the new 2600pro? If you didnt I would suggest doing a full uninstall, and use DH DriverCleaner to remove old registry entires, and files used by ATI stuff and double check it with a registry cleaner if you have one, if you dont I would suggest Registry Mechanic, or use Eusing Free Registry Cleaner I used to use both of them when I was on XP.. If that doesnt work, I would try the latest 8.2 Catalyst release for XP (assuming your on XP since Omega doesnt do Vista drivers ) and report back on what happens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Well I installed the 8.2 ATI Catalyst drivers and everything seems to be running normally. I'm on XP pro SP 2, I guess my problem is I upgraded from my 9800 PRO card that got fried and I really expected a drastic performance improvement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
USB 3 dot oh
|
2600Pro isnt very powerful at all, but it should be faster than that 9800.....
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|