|
|||||||
| Windows XP Radeon Display Drivers The official Omegadrive support forum. Also discuss ATI's Catalyst Control Center and windows drivers here. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Mar 3, 2008, 09:02 PM
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
|
wtf ?
im having an error like this -
 when im trying to install the ATI Ultimate CS Drivers. My video card is ATI Radeon 9550 / 128 mb. PLEASE HELP ME !and sorry for my bad english :/ |
|
|
|
Mar 3, 2008, 09:33 PM
|
#2 |
|
Int'l Fish Liaison
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: By the light of lamp I sit and type...
Posts: 16,187
Rep Power: 109   |
I believe that driver is 4 or 5 years old, right? That might be the problem. Why don't you try something a little more recent. Something in the Cat 6.5 range should support your card.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 3, 2008, 09:37 PM
|
Thread Starter
#3
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
|
em.. i need a driver with what i would get a 100 fps in CS 1.6 and it will not drop :/
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 4, 2008, 03:13 PM
|
#4 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
|
Just wondering .. Why the hell would you need 100FPS ??? As long as its over 25 its as good as 100.
__________________
When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 4, 2008, 03:31 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
*cough*...
because that's what he wants... your personal preference vs his have no weight here. While i would agree that a minimum of 60fps is nessary.... and the 100 is a fair bit over the top....... that's what he wants.. that's what he was able to obtain....... now he's essentially toast in that the driver is no longer supported all around and needs to be updated.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 4, 2008, 06:19 PM
|
#6 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
|
Didnt say that he shouldnt have 100FPS or that i dont like him to have it .. i just wondered why he wants 100FPS .. i dont get the point of having 100FPS and why would anyone spend time trying to get it.
__________________
When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 4, 2008, 09:37 PM
|
#7 |
|
DH's oldest Geek
|
Well. I'm not familiar with that game, but would a 9550 be capable of doing 100fps in it? That's also assuming that the rest of his system is also up to the task?
Those ARE pretty old drivers. I just went to the AMD/ATI site and if you do the 'lookup' it points the 9550 to the Cat 6.11s here: Catalyst™ 6.11 Display Driver for Windows XP Professional/Home Edition I'd suggest that you start with them, and work back if necessary.
__________________
When looking for a reason as to why things go wrong, never rule out sheer STUPIDITY 
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 4, 2008, 11:45 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
the 9500 series and up are all supported by the latest drivers....
anything under that is 6.11s..... i'm running windows vista x64 with a radeon 9550se...
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 5, 2008, 03:20 AM
|
#9 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
|
CS 1.6 is weak, any modern driver should be fine
& it's best to have massive fps in an online game, this isnt a single player rpg |
|
|
|
|
Mar 5, 2008, 03:43 AM
|
#10 |
|
Going Insane.....
|
have the card, 8.2 supports it man, ditch those POS drivers
__________________
Hardwareheaven Super-Moderator last updated (5/18/11)
Rosewill FUTURE case replaces CM 690 II with its greater interior length. Written by Kristopher Pedemonte and Nathan Marks-Forder Edited by Allan Campbell Questions or Comments? feel free to post them in the forums! |
|
|
|
|
Mar 5, 2008, 09:00 PM
|
#11 |
|
DH's oldest Geek
|
OOOPPPSSSS
I looked again, and when I selected the card I hit the 9250 instead of the 9550  The site DOES send the 9250 to the 6.11s, but the 9550 goes to the 8.2s. Bad Buzzard...BAD
__________________
When looking for a reason as to why things go wrong, never rule out sheer STUPIDITY
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
