HardwareHeaven.com

HardwareHeaven.com

Looking for the skin chooser?
 
 
  • Home

  • Hardware reviews

  • Articles

  • News

  • Tools

  • Gaming at HardwareHeaven

  • Forums

 

Go Back   HardwareHeaven.com > Forums > Graphics Cards > AMD Radeon Drivers > Windows XP Radeon Display Drivers


Windows XP Radeon Display Drivers The official Omegadrive support forum. Also discuss ATI's Catalyst Control Center and windows drivers here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 28, 2004, 02:08 PM   #1
DriverHeaven Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
jmh78 is on a distinguished road

Could Omega be the answer?

Please Help!

I am running a Dell 8500 laptop with Radeon Mobility 9000, and MS Flight Simulator 2004 won't run. I'm met with the following message:

"The drivers currently installed for your video card may cause your computer to stop responding when Flight Simulator is running. Click Yes to search for newer drivers, or No to continue in software mode. Some graphical features may not appear in software mode."

When I run DXDIAG, the option to enable 3D acceleration is greyed out and unavailable.

IS THE ANSWER TO UPGRADE TO THE NEW OMEGA DRIVER based on the Catalyst 8.07 drivers?

I read somewhere that the Mobility 9000 card wasn't compatible with DirectX9, but my older laptop running GeForce2 was very happy with Flight Sim 2004 and DirectX 9!

Thanks

JMH78
jmh78 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old Oct 28, 2004, 02:47 PM   #2
Anti-Piracy Poster Boy
 
YAYitsAndrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,605
Rep Power: 79
YAYitsAndrew has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenYAYitsAndrew has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenYAYitsAndrew has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenYAYitsAndrew has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenYAYitsAndrew has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenYAYitsAndrew has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenYAYitsAndrew has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenYAYitsAndrew has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenYAYitsAndrew has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenYAYitsAndrew has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenYAYitsAndrew has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seen
System Specs

You may wanna try updating your motherboard's chipset drivers. I know on my old socket a board if I didn't have the latest nforce drivers installed I couldn't enable AGP.

There's a difference between having directx 9 installed and being able to use it. Some card just can't use it. I have an old laptop with a mobility 7500 in it that isn't dx9 compliant, and no dx9 games will work on it. They'll run, but everything will be shades of black and transparent. I'm not sure if your mobility 9000 would fall in this category, you'll have to wait for someone more knowledgeable to answer.
__________________
"It is because the resistance to paying for copyrighted material, although often characterized as arising from a supposed technical burden or principled concern for the public interest, arises rather from exactly the same segment of the brain that is dominant in shoplifters."
- Mark Helprin, Digital Barbarism

In other words, it's never okay to steal even if you think you have a good reason!

www.yayitsandrew.com
YAYitsAndrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 28, 2004, 03:15 PM   #3
DH's oldest Geek
 
OldBuzzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oberlin, OH
Posts: 2,783
Rep Power: 145
OldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refute
System Specs

There is a file "display.cfg" located in the FS9 main folder that you can edit to see just what that 9000 is capable of in FS9.

Back it up first, and then open it in NOTEPAD, and comment out (they use the ; for that) all entries for the 9000. That should allow you to get past the error notificatio and alow you to run the sim.
I did something similar with CFS3 when I was on my old system that had a (shudder) Savage 2000 and forced the game to allow me to use it. It was 'barely playable' and then only at absolute minimum settings, and had horrible (even for CFS3) frame rates. Don't be suprised if you see the the same thing with FS9. That puppy needs a LOT of CPU/GUP power and a lot of memory. Even with my current system, I can't max out the vid settings in FS9. I just don't have enough GPU for that.
__________________
When looking for a reason as to why things go wrong, never rule out sheer STUPIDITY
OldBuzzard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2004, 09:10 AM Threadstarter Thread Starter   #4
DriverHeaven Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
jmh78 is on a distinguished road

Thanks for the tips, but I just can't believe FS9 simply won't play because of the graphics card's incompatibility. My older laptop played it fine, and DirectX was only on version 7 back then!!

Has anyone else got any thoughts?



Thanks
jmh78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2004, 10:39 AM   #5
DH's oldest Geek
 
OldBuzzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oberlin, OH
Posts: 2,783
Rep Power: 145
OldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refute
System Specs

I just looked at my installed flight sims, CFS1,CFS2,CFS3, FS2002, and FS9/FS2004. CFS1 is the only one that does not have that DISPLAY.CFG file (except that in CFS3 it's named CFS3CONFIGDATABASE.TXT). They use those files to 'look' at your vid card, and also compare what driver version you are using. In their testing of the game, someone has determined that your card is will not be able to display the game properly. If you want to TRY to play the game on your current setup, you will have to edit that file in the way that I have previously stated. I did that with CFS3, and found that they DID know what they were doing as regards to vid card capabilities vs. game requirements.

If you ran a MS flight sim in the Dx 7 days it was most likely FS98 or FS2000, as FS2000 came with DX7 on the installation CD. You certainly did not run FS9 on that system, and there is a world of difference between FS2000 and 2004.

Like I said, you can modify that file and TRY to run FS9 on that system, but I'm betting that it will be a slideshow with FPS in the 8-10 range IF you are lucky. I doubt that it would help, but have you also installed the FS2004 patch?
__________________
When looking for a reason as to why things go wrong, never rule out sheer STUPIDITY
OldBuzzard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2004, 11:09 AM Threadstarter Thread Starter   #6
DriverHeaven Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
jmh78 is on a distinguished road

On my old Dell Inspiron 8100 I was running FS2004 with a GeForce2 I think it was. So DirectX9 was developed well after my laptop had been.

I think there's a subtle difference between 1. being able to play Flight Sim 2004 and 2. being able to access its advanced DirectX9 features including some of the fancy rendering and graphics. For the latter, I accept that you do need a DirectX9 compatible card, but given that these have only been around a short while, I simply cannot believe that Microsoft would alienate all users with pre-2003 pcs/laptops by demanding Direct9-designed graphics cards for FS2004. Anyway, the fact that my Inspiron 8100 (2001 vintage) was happy with FS2004 (yes, 2004, as well as 2002 and 2000) proves this.

So the issue really is getting the Radeon Mobility 9000 to simply work with Directx9, rather than access the most advanced features of Directx9 games.

Really I need to speak to someone senior at ATI/Dell, but it's so hard to get hold of them...
jmh78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2004, 01:56 PM Threadstarter Thread Starter   #7
DriverHeaven Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
jmh78 is on a distinguished road

Also, here's a Directx9 game but it lists Radeon Mobility as supported:

http://www.gamershell.com/news/9716.html
jmh78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 29, 2004, 10:48 PM   #8
DH's oldest Geek
 
OldBuzzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oberlin, OH
Posts: 2,783
Rep Power: 145
OldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refuteOldBuzzard has a reputation beyond refute
System Specs

OK...I just looked at my FS2004 install CD #1 and in the README.RTF file they do mention the 9000 as having issues with resolutions greater than 1024 x 768. So, it does appear to be supported.

That leaves the driver version as your next step. You never did say just what driver version you are using. I'd suggest that you start with the latest CATs first and see what happens. Some games like the latest driver versions, and others don't. I know that at one time IL2 FB ran better on drivers that were about 3-4 generations older than the current ones.


I know that on my system I did get a pretty decent increase in FPS in FS2004 with the CAT 4.10's, but I had to go back to the 4.9's because I could not view videos in WMP with the 4.10's installed.
__________________
When looking for a reason as to why things go wrong, never rule out sheer STUPIDITY
OldBuzzard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools