|
|||||||
| Windows XP Radeon Display Drivers The official Omegadrive support forum. Also discuss ATI's Catalyst Control Center and windows drivers here. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Sep 26, 2005, 10:09 PM
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 0  |
Catalyst 5.10 beta?!?!?!
LINK REMOVED
Of interest is the addition of the RV515 RV520, and RV530 DEV_IDs ---PJ Last edited by pr0digal jenius; Sep 26, 2005 at 10:15 PM. |
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 10:12 PM
|
#2 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
according to bable fish its the demo drivers used for the R5XX cards, but this guys modded them also.
__________________
 |
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 10:16 PM
|
#3 |
|
Delete Me
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,648
Rep Power: 0  |
removed the link, as leaked betas aren't in any way beneficial to the community, and seldom work without a hitch anyways.
Good find though 
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 10:17 PM
|
#4 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,472
Rep Power: 66 |
Ah the french... Crazy people!
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 10:18 PM
|
Thread Starter
#5
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 0 |
Ummm, what about the 5.8 beta leak? DH had it before ATI had it on their site.
Besides, where does it say leaked betas are not allowed to be posted? |
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 10:20 PM
|
#6 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
that wasnt a beta leak. DH and ATI work together very closely and we were given the 5.8s and 5.9s 24hrs before the general public.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 10:29 PM
|
Thread Starter
#7
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 0 |
Also, why can't the link stay if there is a disclaimer? Can I post the all the PCI vendor stuff?
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 10:29 PM
|
#8 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Seems fake, anyways I wouldn't advise even bothering with that set
NGO brought the thing to my attention, they also say its some soft of fake / hackjob I don't think station drivers is dumb enough to post real ones since the last time ATI severed them with a cease and desist ordersince then they've hosted alot of "fakes"
__________________
Last edited by The_Neon_Cowboy; Sep 26, 2005 at 10:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 10:31 PM
|
Thread Starter
#9
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
You have no argument. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 10:45 PM
|
#10 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
them but I've unpacked them, and expaneded the driver files manually. Looked at the INF's etc.... Discused this with other people who say the SAME THING that it appears to be a fake / hack job or some sort I wouldn't trust them... Even if these file were real you shouldn't be useing them it would be complely at your own risk and with out any support what so ever. They have tangled with ATI's legal department before with posting betas. something tells me they don't want to revisit that again... 
__________________
Last edited by The_Neon_Cowboy; Sep 26, 2005 at 10:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 10:51 PM
|
#11 |
|
Delete Me
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,648
Rep Power: 0 |
guys, chill out...this isn't the FWZ, no need to get hostile about anything
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 10:52 PM
|
#12 |
|
ATI driver guru
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ATI, Canada
Posts: 678
Rep Power: 61 |
Stick to the real drivers people, you dont want that leaked nonsense. Like I said before if monthly isnt good enough speak up so I can do post CATALYST weekly ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 11:02 PM
|
#13 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 604
Rep Power: 0 |
Hey Terry,
Daily fix would be better for some.................. 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 11:08 PM
|
#14 |
|
Delete Me
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,648
Rep Power: 0 |
then they'd need to change the driver suite from Catalyst to Heroine
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 11:14 PM
|
#15 | |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 604
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26, 2005, 11:58 PM
|
#16 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
i dont think any one would complain about weekly releases...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 12:04 AM
|
#17 | |
|
Bouncing off the Walls
|
I would worry about weekly releases... just seems too exessive in the way of too much time would be spent on releasing vs. fixing. Let the poor guys at ATI work and once a month is fine
atleast for me ... otherwise poor modders... could you imagin modding and testing weekly?!!?? OHH HELL NO!
__________________
 "You might be Eaten by a Grue" MC Frontalot! Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 12:05 AM
|
#18 | |
|
HH Administrator
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 01:28 AM
|
#19 | ||
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 01:36 AM
|
#20 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 0 |
How about just hourly
Just email em to us LOL Second though why not just let us all work at ATi so we can get them as soon as they are done compiling
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 01:50 AM
|
#21 |
|
Frozen in Carbonite
|
We don't want to over work them. They need to have a life too.
 I'm happy with monthly updates myself.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 02:01 AM
|
Thread Starter
#22
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 0 |
The only reason why Nvidia can pump out beta drivers every other day is because they actually have an OFFICIAL message board, significantly larger number of fan sites, and users anxious to test.
Edit: Substantial amount of OEM drivers from card makers and system builders is another reason. |
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 02:03 AM
|
#23 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 0 |
Wow Catalyst Maker maybe im dreaming but can it be that this leaked one has AVC H.264 acceleration i can play High Profile 1080p without stuttering now on a 2.4 Ghz machine and that via Mplayer it seems to accelerate the surface impressive
and that on a Radeon 9800 pro r360.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 02:06 AM
|
#24 |
|
-=[DHzer0point Team]=-
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 173
Rep Power: 0 |
Terry, I would love a weekly or BI-Weekly driver.
Im half tempted to install these (fake) 5.10 drivers as well.... ever since after driver version 5.6, atleast me useing a radeon 9800 pro 128meg video card, have had issues with Dawn of War getting stuttering so bad on any settings that it appears to stop and go. Along with that, BOS 'Bet on Soldier' also sees a issue with useing drivers past 5.6 with there game for some ATI users. The explosion in the demo useually takes me out (VPU reset to crash). BTW- I wouldnt advise useing these drivers at all untill I give them a run through. Me having a old 9800 pro im kinda hopeing it burns up so that I have a reason to buy a R520. PS: These drivers are build dated for the 7th. The offical drivers are 9/1 or 9/2. So in theory, these could be like 5 days newer than the officals. One thing that I found odd was that the INF file that is with this was marked for today, the 26th at 12:36pm. This basicaly means that they modified the inf today probably to add all video cards that are not the new R500 set. |
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 02:07 AM
|
Thread Starter
#25
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 02:09 AM
|
Thread Starter
#26
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 0 |
(If posting this is not okay, please delete it...)
Here's the PCI Vendor ID list. "RV515 Series" = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7142 "RV515 Series " = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7146 "RV515 Series " = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_714E "RV515 Series " = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7140 "RV515 Series Secondary" = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7160 "RV515 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7162 "RV515 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7166 "RV515 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_RV515, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_716E "RV520 Series " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7109 "RV520 Series " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_710B "RV520 Series " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_710C "RV520 Series " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7108 "RV520 Series " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_710A "RV520 Series Secondary" = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7120 "RV520 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7129 "RV520 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_712A "RV520 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_712C "RV520 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_7128 "RV520 Series Secondary " = ati2mtag_R520, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_712B "RV530 " = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71C6 "RV530 Secondary" = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71E6 "RV530 " = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71C2 "RV530 Secondary" = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71E2 "RV530" = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71CE "RV530 Secondary" = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71EE "RV530 " = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71C0 "RV530 Secondary" = ati2mtag_RV26V, PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_71E0 Voici quelques informations du package; Date du driver; 06/09/2005 WHQL: non Officiel: non Sous:Windows 2000/Xp Pour Chipset: Radeon Serie |
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 02:15 AM
|
#27 |
|
-=[DHzer0point Team]=-
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 173
Rep Power: 0 |
You know come to think about it. I would almost definatly have to get with some people to try and devise a auto uninstall/install for the ATI driver at that point. Then again, now that im just useing the driver and no control panel, it isnt as big of deal as it was.
Is it just me or do things just run faster with no control panel at all installed? Ive got my system down to booting to only useing 150megs of ram includeing firewall and anti virus.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 04:41 AM
|
#28 | |
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Nashville, TN. Music City USA
Posts: 285
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
__________________
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 05:30 AM
|
#29 | |||||
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
per year. Yes, they opened their own forums a few mouths back while ATI has been out in the actual community for years. They don’t have to have nor need an “official board” for "fans only" where they can control everyhing. NVIDIA has no driver feed back program though when you go to their site you can submit a “support” ticket to their customer service.. Their officially “leaked” betas are the official releases. Yet NVIDIA stresses you should only use the officials. If they wouldn’t have any customers. When I used a NV card in my main rig years ago. Betas where just about all you ever used well since like NVIDIA. No need for support, feedback, qaulity testing, WHQL, little things like that. The fix was find another beta driver that might not have that issue. It’s the same today go figure! I love their numbering scheme too. The drivers are all over the place version and date wise. I’ve yet to see and actual NVIDIA rep on any public forum. Other then the one they recently opened. Found this gem on rage3d from this guy Quote:
the leaks dried up. As the drivers are even water marked and they know where they came from so leaking them would be an act of stupidity. Not to mention a violation of a legally binding agreement with ATI. Also ATI releases an offical WHQL driver every month. Quote:
but you would know him as the head of the Catalyst Crew. Yiou know the people that makes the drivers. Quote:
In fact the higest / latest card listed is X850 series. Not to mention in INF's have errors, and they fail to install on many cards / systems. Even messes up when they are manually installed. I checked them out since after all it was time for my regular format and did so after I got my files back up, AS I knew a format would clean out any crap left from these. AS I said before I'D ADVISE YOU TO NOT USE THESE DRIVERS. Quote:
over sized please read the forum rules on the matter. http://www.hardwareheaven.com/feedback/13-forum-custom-titles-avatars-signatures.html You need to fix that ASAP man. I'm not a moderator but better if you fix it before a moderator or ADMIN catches it.
__________________
Last edited by The_Neon_Cowboy; Sep 27, 2005 at 10:46 AM. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
Sep 27, 2005, 05:42 AM
|
#30 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 0 |
I still wonder what driver all these Crossfire sites are using
All they list are Crossfire WHQL driver? Which is 5.9 or one a bit newer
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
