|
|||||||
| Windows XP Radeon Display Drivers The official Omegadrive support forum. Also discuss ATI's Catalyst Control Center and windows drivers here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Founder
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 32,480
Rep Power: 179 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I thought this would be an important poll to make at this time because, as most of you know Terry visits the board and im sure he would be interested in your feedback regarding this. I know for a fact from speaking to him that he has been working his ass off with improving the drivers.
So give your vote and post a little comment if you wish. How do you really feel, has ATI support and driver quality increased over the last 6 months? are you happy with drivers? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 959
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I would have to say Improved greatly. At the beginning of this program it was alittle rocky, but over time the state of ATi`s drivers are IMO best in the business now.They have been more involved with the public since the cat`s were released and support has grown by leaps and bounds. Great Job ATi! I have high hopes for the future and will continue only buying ATi cards for my system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I actually dont think it has been as bad as many people say. I'v been happy eversince i got my original Radeon and i'm happy with my Hercules8500LE, now 9100
. But they have improved and that''s very very good. I'm gonna stick with ATI if they keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 959
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I wonder if i can vote agian for Improved...... HEH i cant stress it enough that the drivers are great!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Freedom is a feature.
|
Improved
Definitly improved a lot. I still think that there is room for improvement, but comparing what it was before, it got a lot better (maybe even kind of reference). OpenGL got a lot better than before, and I like support for both ATI and OEM boards in a single set. Good job, ATI!
__________________
-- Vedran |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
It Never.....
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,173
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
They have done a good job on driver support. Hope they keep on it
__________________
[color=blue]Bleeding From the Inside Pouring Out, The DriverHeaven Spiral, We Shall Never Let Go Of.[/color]
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
HH Old Fuddy Duddy
|
After using ATi cards for nearly 5 years now, I have to vote a definitive: Improved!
I'd like to also state that I've had excellent service from ATi since the gitgo. My first ATi card was the AiW Pro 8 MB PCI card. I had some artifacts in FF 6 and they authorized an RMA on the card. I sent it off and had it back within a week! AND the artifacts problem was fixed, too. Very honestly, I've had questions about all the bad complaints I see posted, because I've had very good results when things aren't just right. This is including email response from ATi, too. Dyre Straits PS Do I get my free 9700 Pro now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Improved greatly.
I would still like to see d3d improvements but no problems with opengl at all. Great work, When can we see that next set of drivers
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
ATI driver guru
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ATI, Canada
Posts: 678
Rep Power: 63 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I want to vote!
Hey I realize since the President of the US is allowed to vote for himself, I want to vote in this poll myself!
Hope nobody minds! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Founder
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 32,480
Rep Power: 179 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: I want to vote!
Quote:
![]() EDIT: hope it wasnt the "not changed"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
ATI driver guru
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ATI, Canada
Posts: 678
Rep Power: 63 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sure! Why not. I honestly do think our drivers have improved vastly since we launched CATALYST!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 959
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Re: I want to vote!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
ATI driver support
ATI drivers IMO have improved dramatically in the last 6 months, I remember owning an ATI card years ago and it was a nightmare. so keep it going in this direction and things are looking good for the company.
its also pretty cool you guys post in here. hopefully we can help you make the drivers even better ! |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
My first ATI card at home. I purchase plenty of PC's at work with ATI inside, laptops as well. I'm pleased with the support since I finally made the move from 3DFX. Keep up the good work; easily accessible and updated support is where it's at when I make purchasing decisions--price is always a factor as well...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 158
Rep Power: 61 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yeah I agree, I dont think anyone (apart from Nvidia fanboys) could say ATI havent improved. i think nvidia are running scared to be honest. I mean we have only seen one set of average benches on Maximum pc and continualy delayed release dates of the FX.
anyway not to get distracted. good work Catalyst maker, cant wait for the R350, ive been buying ATI forever ! the drivers rock (especially the Cat 3a) |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
American Soldier
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 1,725
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
everyone i know with a radeon loves the catalysts, and support calls have dropped dramatically for the ati users i support.
definitely improved
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 225
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Definitely improved quite a bit. I'm really impressed with the way ATI's been more involved with communities like this one lately, also. I'm very happy with my 8500 and looking forward to upgrading to a newer Radeon in the near future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
A Legend in Underwear
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Unknown
Posts: 5,255
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
However, they don't look "professional". Honesty, seeing that the OpenGL & DirectX tabs share so much in common, why don't the controls line up? If you tab between the two you see the controls on the tab slightly larger or slightly offset with each other ![]() Also, you can't actually see the OK & Cancel buttons in low resolutions 640x480 which makes pressing them slightly hard Fix those two gripes and you have vastly improved drivers (since my experience with an ATI 8500 - now using a 9700 pro) with a slick looking interface
__________________
Gentoo Linux - Developer (baselayout) Read my blog "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Stephen Roberts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
ATI driver guru
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ATI, Canada
Posts: 678
Rep Power: 63 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Actually the problem with the size of the control panel is something we plan on fixing. It's just we keep on adding more and more features on the panels and are really pressed for room. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 959
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
Some people are easy to please..... heh. Maybe more tabs would help? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
A Legend in Underwear
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Unknown
Posts: 5,255
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Or even easier ask yourself this. Do you really have to add 7 tabs? If you activate everything off one "ATI" tab then it would work as that control was designed for 1 tab row on a 640x480 screen by Microsoft.
__________________
Gentoo Linux - Developer (baselayout) Read my blog "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Stephen Roberts |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Better, drivers still have room for improvement
The drivers have measurably improved in the last year. However, my favorite game 'Tribes 2' performs worse on my new Radeon 9500 pro than on my old GEFORCE2 GTS card.... so I am praying for some significant FPS improvements in Tribes II!!!
Anyways, good job. Keep it up, and thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
ATI driver guru
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ATI, Canada
Posts: 678
Rep Power: 63 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
PS. ease of use is something I am a big propenent of, and if you compare our panels a year ago to today hopefully you will agree that the D3D and OGL tabs are much easier right? We are working on the other tabs one by one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
ATI drivers improved dramaticly over the last year(s).
I remember the time when discussions were all over the place about not bying an ATI card because the drivers S*cked (And to be honest...they sure did )I think it's a great move by ATI to keep improving the drivers constantly, because there are a lot of gamers out there that want the best performance and a good set of drivers can do wonders. I agree on the "Professional Look" subject: make the interface really slick and simple. Maybe one big control tab and maybe a good help file included for the noobs. One thing that could be improved is the "Mobility support", but I guess that's not in Terry's hands. Just keep making the drivers like they are now and we'll do the .inf editing ourselfs (*cough* *cough* Omega... )Keep up the good work! |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
ATI driver guru
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ATI, Canada
Posts: 678
Rep Power: 63 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Improved!
Quote:
1) Desktop and drivers are one and the same. 2) I wish I could post updated mobile drivers on ati.com but cant. (the reason is that these drivers are built just for the OEM's and the OEM's want to control the posting) 3) When the driver is ready for distribution we have to 'package' it and at that point we have to disable the option for the driver to work on the laptops? 4) editing .inf files is bad (*cough* *cough* go for it!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 959
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I haave a compaq 1505us and let me tell you they update the drivers once a year it seems lol. I just put a mobility r9000 in it which runs great but my god id love some cat3.0a goodness on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Undisclosed Renegade Location
Posts: 396
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I don't mean to be rude, and you may well not have the answer to my question, but I am curious about something,and seeing that you are currently here Cat maker, I thought I'd take the opportunity to ask.
For the 9700 pro, I find truform is running on software. If I'm not mistaken, there is a certain area on the card dedicated to this function. At the moment, it is running quite slowly, compared to its r200 predecessor. Could you tell me if this is simply a driver optimization issue or if this is how its intended to run. Thanks. -Renegade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Founder
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 32,480
Rep Power: 179 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
perhaps not a direct answer, but ......
from the recent interview with Ben Bar Haim
[Zardon] What type of performance increase can we expect at most from the (semi?) software driver N-patch/PN-triangles implementation on R300? (And since TRUFORM performance is poor on the R300 how will this effect Displacement Mapping). [Ben] While we are always working on ways to increase the performance of our products through our driver software, this area is considered a relatively low priority. TRUFORM technology was designed to enhance 3D applications with low polygon counts (optimized for older graphics hardware) so they could take advantage of the massive vertex processing capabilities of newer hardware. Recent and upcoming 3D games, which are the focus of our performance optimisation efforts, are being designed with much higher polygon counts, so they tend to benefit less from TRUFORM. Displacement mapping is a promising new technology. However, unlike standard N-Patches, it requires a significant amount of developer and art resources to implement in a game, and this will probably limit its adoption in the near term. As the first (and so far, only) available products with hardware and software support for DirectX 9 displacement mapping, the RADEON 9700 and 9500 family provide an ideal test and development platform for future games to make use of this feature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Undisclosed Renegade Location
Posts: 396
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Yes, but was truform 2 not advertised to have a 0 performance hit on any game/application it was incorporated into?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
A.K.A sCoTcH
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Around the oldest trees of region 13th, laval.
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Since catalyst, your drivers have jumped on a new level of quality. But, seriously i always wondered why poeple were moaning with your drivers, i never had a single lockup with any ATi cards i owned.
Continue the good job!!! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|