COMPETITION: WHO has the fastest Rig on Driverheaven?

Discussion in 'Overclocking, Benching & Modding' started by HardwareHeaven, May 25, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Down1oader

    Down1oader New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    lol... is that good or bad?
     
  2. HardwareHeaven

    HardwareHeaven Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2002
    Messages:
    32,274
    Likes Received:
    163
    Trophy Points:
    88
    I would have thought it was pretty much impossible, unless its one of nvidias "famous" low IQ benching drivers or some kind of glitch.

    an overclocked 9800 XT (a much faster card) at 450-460 core and 400 ram, scores around 6600-6800 in that test.
     
  3. Down1oader

    Down1oader New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  4. HardwareHeaven

    HardwareHeaven Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2002
    Messages:
    32,274
    Likes Received:
    163
    Trophy Points:
    88
    actually from what im seeing, your 01 score with that graphics card is right, its all the rest of them (barring pcmark02) appear seriously messed up.
     
  5. Down1oader

    Down1oader New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    lol maybe i just got a weird card from MSI
     
  6. HardwareHeaven

    HardwareHeaven Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2002
    Messages:
    32,274
    Likes Received:
    163
    Trophy Points:
    88
  7. zerodamage

    zerodamage New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,478
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are not going to get any awards here for cheating.
     
  8. The_Neon_Cowboy

    The_Neon_Cowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2002
    Messages:
    16,076
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    73
    hmm.... very odd

    looking at you 2003 scores

    NOTE: This project has not been run with Futuremark approved drivers, or the status of the drivers can not be determined. The accuracy of the results can not be guaranteed. For more information on how to get a valid and comparable result, please refer to this page.

    not to mention 52.16 are the last aproved benchmarking drivers

    Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
    Driver Name NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
    Driver Version 5.3.0.6
    Driver Status Non WHQL - Not FM Approved
    Video Memory 256 MB
    Core Clock 301 MHz
    Memory Clock 983 MHz


    yet you description says MSI GeForce Fx 5900 Ultra 256mb DDR (508/984 Det 53.06)

    something is defonately wrong here...



    Program Version 3DMark03 Revision 4 Build 0

    oh looky the magor cheat version, the one that nvida got thier chops busted over becouse of what 30% cheat?, why aren't you useing build 340? hmm :hmm: ?
     
  9. Down1oader

    Down1oader New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i dont cheat what would be the point in that? how can i prove im not cheating and i am using build 340!
     
  10. zerodamage

    zerodamage New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,478
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah Neon. I pointed those out to Zardon. The Build 0 and the note about unauthorized drivers.
     
  11. HardwareHeaven

    HardwareHeaven Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2002
    Messages:
    32,274
    Likes Received:
    163
    Trophy Points:
    88
    ok before this turns into an argument, id like to say perhaps downloader didnt do this intentionally, but I will say those scores arent right. quite a few people have already noticed it. from the 3dmark03 score of over 7000 which is genuinely impossible at your clocks. this is why FM patched the application. if you run those again with the newest build it should drop to a more reasonable and honest level.

    The aquamark score isnt correct. there are some threads, one I just showed you on the aquamark forums which details bugs with those cards.

    your 3dmark01 and pcmark02 scores look fine.
     
  12. The_Neon_Cowboy

    The_Neon_Cowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2002
    Messages:
    16,076
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    73
  13. Down1oader

    Down1oader New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  14. GutterPunk

    GutterPunk I = Greatest Dood

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,950
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    58
    even tho you have possible bugged scores on the other good job on your pcmark scores they were pretty n ice @ 3.2
     
  15. Down1oader

    Down1oader New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :) 2.8ghz 800 fsb overclocked to 3.2ghz on air using coolermaster pro aerocool (non jet version) i think i should be getting more on my mem tho its 1024mb dual chan OCZ pc 4200 EL cost me £350 and i dont even think im gonna use its full potential!
     
  16. Down1oader

    Down1oader New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2004
  17. Down1oader

    Down1oader New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  18. HardwareHeaven

    HardwareHeaven Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2002
    Messages:
    32,274
    Likes Received:
    163
    Trophy Points:
    88
    scores much more accurate now almost 1000 points drop in 3dmark03 - nvidia bleh !! just the bugged am3 one isnt right, but looking good !
     
  19. G@MeBoY

    [email protected] makes your mouse tremmble!

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2002
    Messages:
    247
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Down1oader, do the 3dmark2001 bench with 40.52 drivers, youll get 20k...with some tweaking even more. Trust me. ForceWare are very bad for 3dmark 2001.

    btw. why do you, Zardon, think that his 17500k in 3dmark 2001 are good (average) score ?! I mean i have 15k with my ti4200 ( I dont know how to cheat on this, sorry ) why wouldn't he get 20k with fx5900 ?! Here's link to my score: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7645228

    cheers !
     
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2004
  20. HardwareHeaven

    HardwareHeaven Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2002
    Messages:
    32,274
    Likes Received:
    163
    Trophy Points:
    88
    When I said "good" I meant more realistic than the others.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

visited