Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results

Discussion in 'Overclocking, Benching & Modding' started by MIG-31, Dec 12, 2010.

  1. blibbax

    blibbax nahm8

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    6,210
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    73
    I reckon you could catch the mighty Lowfat with a little OCing Takaharu :p
     
  2. Takaharu

    Takaharu Unus offa, unus iuguolo

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,325
    Likes Received:
    324
    Trophy Points:
    108
    Apparently a GTS 450 dedicated to PhysX doesn't make that much difference: P8658
     
  3. Chaos

    Chaos Number Nine

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    5,260
    Likes Received:
    95
    Trophy Points:
    0
  4. IvanV

    IvanV HH Assassin Guild Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    10,434
    Likes Received:
    1,665
    Trophy Points:
    138
    What is the difference between different presets, other than the resolution?
     
  5. Mr Cairo

    Mr Cairo Require backup .... NO

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    3,256
    Likes Received:
    572
    Trophy Points:
    138
    hmmmm seems like its the x2 amd core that's the issue for me scoring so low
     
  6. blibbax

    blibbax nahm8

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    6,210
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    73
    What are you getting in 3dmark11?
     
  7. Lowfat

    Lowfat Xtreme

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    4,246
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It won't make any difference. 3DMark 11 doesn't support GPU accelerated PhysX.
     
  8. Takaharu

    Takaharu Unus offa, unus iuguolo

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,325
    Likes Received:
    324
    Trophy Points:
    108
    Entry
    Resolution: 1024x600
    Scaling: Centered
    MSAA Sample Count: 1
    Texture Filtering Mode: Trilinear
    Tesselation Detail: 5
    Max Tessellation Factor: 6
    Shadow Map Size: 1
    Surface Shadow Sample Count: 8
    Volumetric Illumination Quality: 1
    Ambient Occlusion Quality: 1
    Depth of Field Quality: 1
    Colour Saturation: 100%

    Performance
    (As basic with the following modifications)
    Resolution: 1280x720
    Max Tessellation Factor: 10
    Shadow Map Size: 5
    Surface Shadow Sample Count: 16
    Volumetric Illumination Quality: 5
    Ambient Occlusion Quality: 5
    Depth of Field Quality: 5

    Extreme
    (As basic with the following modifications)
    Resolution: 1920x1080
    MSAA Sample Count: 4
    Texture Filtering Mode: Anisotropic
    Max Anisoptopy: 16
    Max Tessellation Factor: 15
    Shadow Map Size: 10
    Surface Shadow Sample Count: 5
    Volumetric Illumination Quality: 5
    Ambient Occlusion Quality: 10
    Depth of Field Quality: 10

    Maximum settings
    Scaling: Centered/Stretched
    MSAA Sample Count: 8
    Texture Filtering Mode: Anisotropic
    Max Anisotropy: 16
    Tessellation Detail: 10
    Max Tessellation Factor: 15
    Shadow Map Size: 10
    Shadow Cascade Sample Count: 16
    Volumetric Illumination Quality: 10
    Depth of Field Quality: 10
    Color Saturation: 0-200%

    Also Available:
    Loop, Demo Audio, Window Mode, Vertical Sync, Triple Buffering, Wireframe, GPU count.
     
    IvanV likes this.
  9. IvanV

    IvanV HH Assassin Guild Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    10,434
    Likes Received:
    1,665
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Thanks!
     
  10. Takaharu

    Takaharu Unus offa, unus iuguolo

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,325
    Likes Received:
    324
    Trophy Points:
    108
    If I could cry that easily this score would make me.
    Maybe I should go back to the 950?
     
  11. blibbax

    blibbax nahm8

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    6,210
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    73
    WTF!? It's the combined score where you really bombed, which suggests a problem with GPU compute, unless I am mistaken? Physics score, which is purely CPU, actually increased.

    Where did you get a 965 from anyway?
     
  12. Takaharu

    Takaharu Unus offa, unus iuguolo

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,325
    Likes Received:
    324
    Trophy Points:
    108
    I reset the BIOS and tried again :lol: P8852
    Although the score isn't that different from the 950 the combined test did take a while to build up speed; it starts at around 0.8fps then climbs during the duration of the test. I have no idea if that is its peak.

    blibbax - you really have to ask? :p
     
  13. blibbax

    blibbax nahm8

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    6,210
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Is it the unlocked multiplier version? 45nm or 32nm?

    Either way, you best be planning to push 4GHZ+ out of that :p
     
  14. OldBuzzard

    OldBuzzard DH's oldest Geek

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    2,777
    Likes Received:
    145
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Running everything at stock. I tried running OCed to 3.8GHZ, but it locked up on the 1st physics test.

    Didn't llike the Cat 11.5 drivers either :)

    Result
     
  15. CJLMTLCA

    CJLMTLCA Ti > IT

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    38
  16. MIG-31

    MIG-31 HardwareHeaven News Mod Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    73,899
    Likes Received:
    1,968
    Trophy Points:
    153
    New score thanks to HH's donation...

    P3834
     
  17. blibbax

    blibbax nahm8

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    6,210
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    73
    I'm surprised to see that not higher - you're effectively running double my new rig there (taking a dual core to be half of a quad and a 6850 to be similar to a 460) with only 25% more points.
     
  18. MIG-31

    MIG-31 HardwareHeaven News Mod Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    73,899
    Likes Received:
    1,968
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Now at least for me the link is not working.... But to add to this I don't usually run B/M of any sort...

    I simply think its just a bunch of numbers.. and to me its a little pointless... As i have this pc running again with my 460 (i will be back to sli mode next week) without issues and is smooth enough for me then thats what counts.

    I just gave it a dummy run...
     
  19. blibbax

    blibbax nahm8

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    6,210
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Ah, you don't have both 460s in yet. That explains it :p
     
  20. MIG-31

    MIG-31 HardwareHeaven News Mod Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    73,899
    Likes Received:
    1,968
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Updated score.... (Before anyone asks im having some hassle getting the other 460 back)

    3852
     

Share This Page

visited